Screener
CQQQ vs MCHI
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF
Key differences
- MCHI costs 0.06% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, CQQQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $6.7B |
| Since | 2009 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | -5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 20.00% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -62.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and MCHI
Explore further