Screener
CQQQ vs FXI
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Key differences
- CQQQ costs 0.08% less per year.
- FXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.73% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $6.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 2.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +0.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 19.74% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -60.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and FXI
Explore further