Screener
MINT vs MEAR
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.10% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINT | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 4.56 | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.27% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -4.62% | -2.68% |
Similar to MINT and MEAR
Explore further