Skip to content
Screener

CTEX vs UYM

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs ProShares Ultra Materials

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF

Annual cost

0.58%

Fund size

$7M

UYM

ProShares Ultra Materials

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$40M

Key differences

Both CTEX and UYM are equity ETFs. CTEX charges 0.58% a year and UYM 0.95%. The main difference: CTEX follows a index tracking strategy; UYM uses leveraged.

  • CTEX follows a index tracking strategy; UYM uses leveraged.
  • CTEX costs 0.37% less per year.
  • UYM is much larger than CTEX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • UYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CTEXUYM
Annual cost (TER)0.58%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$7M$40M
Since20212007
Dividend yield1.50%1.23%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingleveraged
CAGR 1Y+126.4%+24.1%
CAGR 3Y+12.9%+13.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+1.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.410.43
Volatility 1Y43.31%33.98%
Max drawdown-70.30%-73.31%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to CTEX and UYM