Screener
UYM vs TINT
ProShares Ultra Materials vs ProShares Smart Materials ETF
Key differences
- TINT costs 0.37% less per year.
- UYM is significantly larger than TINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UYM follows a leveraged strategy; TINT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- UYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UYM | TINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $2M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 1.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +50.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.86% | 23.73% |
| Max drawdown | -73.31% | -41.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UYM and TINT
Explore further