Screener
CWS vs THNQ
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- CWS follows a active selection strategy; THNQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CWS | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $155M | $322M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.31% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.0% | +71.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.4% | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.35% | 26.07% |
| Max drawdown | -33.82% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CWS and THNQ
Explore further