Screener
THNQ vs AFOS
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
Key differences
- AFOS costs 0.23% less per year.
- THNQ follows a index tracking strategy; AFOS uses active selection.
- THNQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THNQ | AFOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $322M | $272M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.07% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.56% | -11.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THNQ and AFOS
Explore further