Screener
CZA vs RWL
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.30% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than CZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZA | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $184M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.79% | 10.11% |
| Max drawdown | -46.18% | -36.04% |
Similar to CZA and RWL
Explore further