Screener
CZAR vs NANR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR is classified as equity, while NANR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $795M |
| Since | 2023 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +53.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -49.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and NANR
Explore further