Screener
CZAR vs GNR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CZAR covers north america markets; GNR covers global.
- GNR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CZAR | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.47% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.2% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.55% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -13.38% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CZAR and GNR
Explore further