Screener
NANR vs HAP
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.06% less per year.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while HAP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $316M |
| Since | 2015 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NANR and HAP
Explore further