Screener
DIVS vs DIVZ
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs Polen Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.20% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS covers global markets; DIVZ covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | DIVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $242M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 9.19% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and DIVZ
Explore further