Screener
DIVS vs IDVZ
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs Polen International Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.30% less per year.
- IDVZ is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | IDVZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $155M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -10.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and IDVZ
Explore further