Screener
DIVZ vs ADIV
Polen Dividend Income ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DIVZ costs 0.13% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVZ | ADIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $55M |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.19% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVZ and ADIV
Explore further