Screener
DIVS vs EFAD
Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- DIVS follows a active selection strategy; EFAD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVS | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $62M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.75% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.54% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -29.55% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVS and EFAD
Explore further