Screener
DIVZ vs DIVS
Polen Dividend Income ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.20% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than DIVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVZ covers north america markets; DIVS covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DIVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVZ | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $39M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.19% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVZ and DIVS
Explore further