Screener
DIVZ vs DVYA
Polen Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.16% less per year.
- DIVZ is significantly larger than DVYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- DIVZ follows a active selection strategy; DVYA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, DVYA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DIVZ | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $70M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.57% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.19% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DIVZ and DVYA
Explore further