Screener
DRIV vs IBOT
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.21% less per year.
- DRIV is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DRIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DRIV | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $401M | $71M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +83.8% | +56.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.94% | 21.95% |
| Max drawdown | -41.93% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DRIV and IBOT
Explore further