Screener
DVYA vs DIVS
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DVYA follows a index tracking strategy; DIVS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DVYA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| DVYA | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $39M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.31% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.3% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.3% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.00% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -45.61% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to DVYA and DIVS
Explore further