Screener
DYTA vs XNAV
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
DYTA is a fixed income ETF, while XNAV is an alternative ETF. DYTA charges 1.32% a year and XNAV 1.27%.
- DYTA is a fixed income fund, while XNAV is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- XNAV costs 0.05% less per year.
- DYTA is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| DYTA | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.32% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $34M |
| Since | 2023 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 1.52% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.0% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.8% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.12% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -9.41% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.