Skip to content
Screener

EAOA vs EFA

iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

EAOA

iShares ESG Aware 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$37M

EFA

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF

Annual cost

0.32%

Fund size

$77.4B

Key differences

EAOA is a mixed asset ETF, while EFA is an equity ETF. EAOA charges 0.18% a year and EFA 0.32%.

  • EAOA is a mixed asset fund, while EFA is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • EAOA covers global markets; EFA covers global markets excluding the US.
  • EAOA costs 0.14% less per year.
  • EFA is much larger than EAOA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EAOAEFA
Annual cost (TER)0.18%0.32%
Fund size (AUM)$37M$77.4B
Since20202001
Dividend yield1.95%3.10%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionglobalglobal ex us
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+22.1%+21.3%
CAGR 3Y+17.0%+17.0%
CAGR 5Y+8.3%+8.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.070.87
Volatility 1Y11.29%15.64%
Max drawdown-25.06%-34.19%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to EAOA and EFA