Screener
EART vs EMXC
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.34% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART covers global markets; EMXC covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +73.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 1.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and EMXC
Explore further