Screener
EART vs PFFD
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFD costs 0.36% less per year.
- PFFD is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART is classified as equity, while PFFD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EART covers global markets; PFFD covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFFD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | PFFD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 6.30% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -30.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and PFFD
Explore further