Screener
EART vs PFFV
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.34% less per year.
- PFFV is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EART is classified as equity, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EART covers global markets; PFFV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $302M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and PFFV
Explore further