Screener
EART vs TURF
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- TURF costs 0.15% less per year.
- EART follows a index tracking strategy; TURF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | TURF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $117M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | — |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -6.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and TURF
Explore further