Screener
EART vs HAP
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.18% less per year.
- HAP is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HAP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $316M |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and HAP
Explore further