Screener
EART vs GNR
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- GNR costs 0.19% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than EART — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GNR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EART | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +112.4% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.89% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -53.67% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EART and GNR
Explore further