Screener
ECNS vs EWJ
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both ECNS and EWJ are equity ETFs. ECNS charges 0.59% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: ECNS covers emerging markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- ECNS covers emerging markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWJ costs 0.10% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2010 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 6.40% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.6% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.2% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.06% | 19.84% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -33.14% |
Similar to ECNS and EWJ
Explore further