Screener
ECNS vs SCJ
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both ECNS and SCJ are equity ETFs. ECNS charges 0.59% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: ECNS covers emerging markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- ECNS covers emerging markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- SCJ costs 0.09% less per year.
- SCJ is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $245M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 6.40% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.6% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.2% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.06% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -37.28% |
Similar to ECNS and SCJ
Explore further