Screener
EWJ vs CNYA
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both EWJ and CNYA are equity ETFs. EWJ charges 0.49% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- EWJ costs 0.11% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.3B | $242M |
| Since | 1996 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.84% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -49.48% |
Similar to EWJ and CNYA
Explore further