Screener
ECNS vs IPAC
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both ECNS and IPAC are equity ETFs. ECNS charges 0.59% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: ECNS covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- ECNS covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.50% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ECNS | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2010 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.40% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.6% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.4% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -7.2% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.06% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -63.44% | -31.00% |
Similar to ECNS and IPAC
Explore further