Screener
IPAC vs CNYA
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both IPAC and CNYA are equity ETFs. IPAC charges 0.09% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- IPAC costs 0.51% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $242M |
| Since | 2014 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.74% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -49.48% |
Similar to IPAC and CNYA
Explore further