Screener
SCJ vs CNYA
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both SCJ and CNYA are equity ETFs. SCJ charges 0.50% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
- SCJ costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $242M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.70% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -49.48% |
Similar to SCJ and CNYA
Explore further