Screener
EET vs EUM
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets vs ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EET is significantly larger than EUM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EET follows a leveraged strategy; EUM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EET | EUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $48M | $9M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 4.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +107.5% | -32.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.9% | -16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | -5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | -1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 39.49% | 20.34% |
| Max drawdown | -69.06% | -67.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EET and EUM
Explore further