Screener
EFA vs EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Key differences
- EFA is significantly larger than EFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFA | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $75.6B | $15.2B |
| Since | 2001 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.4% | +14.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.0% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.12% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -34.19% | -35.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFA and EFG
Explore further