Screener
EFAD vs DIVS
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- EFAD follows a index tracking strategy; DIVS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DIVS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EFAD | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $39M |
| Since | 2014 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.82% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.1% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.3% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -35.74% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EFAD and DIVS
Explore further