Screener
EINC vs AMZA
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs InfraCap MLP ETF
Key differences
- EINC costs 1.26% less per year.
- AMZA is significantly larger than EINC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EINC follows a index tracking strategy; AMZA uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EINC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EINC | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.46% | 1.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $147M | $464M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 7.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.1% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.6% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.4% | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.47 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.53% | 17.74% |
| Max drawdown | -68.85% | -86.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EINC and AMZA
Explore further