Screener
MLPA vs PIPE
Global X MLP ETF vs Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- MLPA is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPA covers north america markets; PIPE covers global.
- MLPA follows a index tracking strategy; PIPE uses active selection.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | PIPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $64M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 3.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.1% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 14.18% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -15.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and PIPE
Explore further