Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMC vs BREM

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF

EMC

Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$61M

BREM

iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$38M

Key differences

  • BREM costs 0.15% less per year.
  • EMC is classified as equity, while BREM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • EMC follows a active selection strategy; BREM uses index tracking.
  • EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMCBREM
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$61M$38M
Since20102025
Dividend yield0.70%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+30.7%N/A
CAGR 3Y+14.8%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.65N/A
Volatility 1Y20.21%
Max drawdown-18.38%-4.54%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMC and BREM