Screener
EMM vs MILN
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Key differences
- MILN costs 0.16% less per year.
- EMM covers emerging markets markets; MILN covers north america.
- EMM follows a active selection strategy; MILN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $99M |
| Since | 2010 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.4% | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.58% | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -44.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and MILN
Explore further