Screener
EMNT vs EAGG
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EAGG costs 0.14% less per year.
- EAGG is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; EAGG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMNT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | EAGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 3.81% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -18.74% |
Similar to EMNT and EAGG
Explore further