Screener
EMNT vs SUSB
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSB costs 0.12% less per year.
- SUSB is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; SUSB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | SUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 4.49% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 1.93% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -13.25% |
Similar to EMNT and SUSB
Explore further