Screener
EMNT vs SUSC
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUSC costs 0.06% less per year.
- SUSC is significantly larger than EMNT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; SUSC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | SUSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 4.45% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 4.42% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -22.41% |
Similar to EMNT and SUSC
Explore further