Screener
EMNT vs HYXF
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG Exchange-Traded Fund vs iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMNT costs 0.11% less per year.
- EMNT follows a active selection strategy; HYXF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMNT | HYXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $207M | $196M |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.12% | 6.19% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.05 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.41% | 7.98% |
| Max drawdown | -2.28% | -18.75% |
Similar to EMNT and HYXF
Explore further