Screener
EMOP vs MEMX
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF
Key differences
- EMOP costs 0.09% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMOP | MEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $45M |
| Since | 1995 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +62.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -19.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMOP and MEMX
Explore further