Screener
EMSF vs NUMG
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both EMSF and NUMG are equity ETFs. EMSF charges 0.79% a year and NUMG 0.31%. The main difference: EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUMG uses index tracking.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; NUMG uses index tracking.
- EMSF covers emerging markets; NUMG covers North America.
- NUMG costs 0.48% less per year.
- NUMG is much larger than EMSF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- NUMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | NUMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46M | $471M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.76% | 0.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | -4.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.56% | 18.45% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -38.85% |
Similar to EMSF and NUMG
Explore further