Screener
EPRF vs VRIG
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than EPRF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF is classified as alternative, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; VRIG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, VRIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 4.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPRF and VRIG
Explore further