Skip to content
Screener

EQWL vs RSPG

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

EQWL

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$2.6B

RSPG

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$576M

Key differences

Both EQWL and RSPG are equity ETFs. EQWL charges 0.25% a year and RSPG 0.40%. The main difference: EQWL costs 0.15% less per year.

  • EQWL costs 0.15% less per year.
  • EQWL is much larger than RSPG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EQWLRSPG
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$2.6B$576M
Since20062006
Dividend yield1.53%2.02%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+21.1%+40.4%
CAGR 3Y+19.7%+17.9%
CAGR 5Y+11.7%+20.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.170.68
Volatility 1Y10.74%21.78%
Max drawdown-34.30%-73.17%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to EQWL and RSPG