Skip to content
Screener

EQWL vs XLG

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

EQWL

Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$2.6B

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$11.1B

Key differences

Both EQWL and XLG are equity ETFs. EQWL charges 0.25% a year and XLG 0.20%. The main difference: EQWL follows a index enhanced strategy; XLG uses index tracking.

  • EQWL follows a index enhanced strategy; XLG uses index tracking.
  • XLG is much larger than EQWL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EQWLXLG
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$2.6B$11.1B
Since20062005
Dividend yield1.53%0.59%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.1%+22.3%
CAGR 3Y+19.7%+23.4%
CAGR 5Y+11.7%+15.3%
Sharpe 3Y1.171.12
Volatility 1Y10.74%13.70%
Max drawdown-34.30%-30.46%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to EQWL and XLG