Screener
XLG vs RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
Both XLG and RSPF are equity ETFs. XLG charges 0.20% a year and RSPF 0.40%. The main difference: XLG follows a index tracking strategy; RSPF uses index enhanced.
- XLG follows a index tracking strategy; RSPF uses index enhanced.
- XLG costs 0.20% less per year.
- XLG is much larger than RSPF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XLG | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $271M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 1.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.3% | +7.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.3% | +6.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.70% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -30.46% | -44.80% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.